Tuesday, 24 March 2015


You could be forgiven for forgetting that the working class make up the vast majority of the population, judging by how our interests and aspirations are ignored or trampled on by politicians representing the tiny minority who have grabbed most of the country's wealth - the 1%.
Then the election looms, so mainstream politicians who hold the working class in contempt suddenly spout nice-sounding promises in a cynical drive for votes.
Last week we suffered the spectacle of Old Etonian George Osborne declaiming that "Britain is the comeback country", "Britain is walking tall", "Jobs up, unemployment down, wages up"...etc.
Even this remote, upper-class snob has been advised by his focus groups that jobs and pay are critical factors in how most people vote.

Jobs is one of the critical issues to judge the competing political parties on.
The Tory/LibDem Coalition makes hay of falling unemployment. But scratch the shiny surface and you find an ugly reality. Unemployment figures have fallen as a result of 1.5 million new jobs since 2010. But a new wave of self-employed makes up an incredible 32% of these. Far from this signaling a flourishing of entrepreneurial genius and affluence, new research shows 80% of the self-employed are living in poverty! These are mostly people who would rather have a secure job but can't find one and end up self-employed rather than rely on insecure, part-time and temporary jobs - the main types created since 2010.
As the TUC reported, only one in 40 of the new jobs are full-time and permanent. There are still 80,000 fewer full-time jobs in Scotland than before the 2008 recession.
The working class have been plagued by the curse of casualisation over the past 30 years, and this has accelerated with dizzying speed in recent years.
Many of those removed from the unemployment figures are eking out an existence on low-hour contracts, typically of 8-12 hours a week. This gives all the power to the employers, who can tap into this ready-made pool of reserve labour to do extra hours - but with no premium rates of pay for 'overtime' - when busy spells in their business demands it.
Underemployment has become the new variation on unemployment.
All too often workers rely on two or three different part-time jobs to try and pay the bills. They miss out on breaks and mealtimes as they rush from one job to the next, dreading the day they get sick, as they usually don't qualify for sick pay.

The ultimate in casualised labour, the pinnacle of job insecurity and lack of workplace rights, are Zero Hours Contracts.

An estimated 200,000 workers in Scotland alone are living the cruel insecurity of Zero Hours Contracts (ZHCs). This gives all the flexibility to the employers, all the risk and low incomes to those working for them. It means being contracted to work for a particular employer, but with absolutely no guarantee of how many hours of work you will get each week - if any!
Workers on ZHCs have absolutely no automatic entitlements to sick pay, holiday pay or redundancy pay. They are expected to be on call, unpaid, waiting by their phone or emails to find out when they're wanted. And real life experience proves that contrary to the baloney about the flexibility afforded to workers, when people decline a shift offered to them, they frequently aren't offered any more for days or weeks after, as bosses exercise their power to punish them.
These obnoxious forms of modern serfdom are not isolated to the outer fringes of the economy: they are rife and spreading in every High Street and retail park.
Over 90% of McDonalds workers are on them: 82,000 in total. Boots employ at least 4,000; 80% of JD Wetherspoons staff; Burger King; Dominos Pizza; Sports Direct; Pizza Hut; Subway; Next; Cineworld; universities... Social care relies on a vast army of ZHC workers - including the social care wing of the Church of Scotland!

The Tories and LibDems have shown in action they are parties that view cheap, casualised, insecure jobs as a virtue.
Labour has belatedly tried to appease the demands of the working class voters they rely on by promising measures on youth employment. And they repeatedly trot out the same two phrases about Zero Hours Contracts, phrases that should be seen for the cruel deceit they are!
Labour promises to "tackle Zero Hours Contracts". What the hell does that mean? Why not say clearly they will ABOLISH them?
Their other phrase, especially used when they are targeting trade unionists for votes, is that Labour will "abolish exploitative Zero Hours Contracts". Unfortunately, that same phrase has also been repeatedly used by the SNP leadership. Watch out for the deceit in that word 'exploitative'. Does that mean they'll keep 'good, non-exploitative Zero Hours Contracts'?!

In fact, Labour has sometimes elaborated that they will reform ZHCs so that if a worker actually works an average of, say, 15 hours a week over 12 weeks, that should then become their contracted hours. A mild improvement indeed, but one which the experience of new Agency Workers' rights should warn us about; bosses find ways of dodging these averages, or for instance could simply cut the average hours they offer each ZHC worker over the 12 weeks.
The SSP has an honest, simple alternative to the dodgy word-games played by both Labour and the SNP: abolish ALL Zero Hours Contracts. They're ALL exploitative, so scrap the lot and instead offer secure contracts, with guaranteed hours, whether part-time or full-time.

When it comes to job creation, the SSP again stands out a mile compared to the rest.
With 157,000 families on the housing waiting list in Scotland, there's a crying need for a massive housebuilding plan of at least 100,000 new social sector homes over the lifetime of the parliament. Houses for affordable rent, built to the highest environmental standards, thereby tackling fuel poverty and helping combat climate change - as well as creating thousands of jobs and apprenticeships, giving decent wages and dignity to young and older workers alike.

Another potential area of vast job expansion is green energy. Scotland's offshore energy potential alone has been rightly described as the Saudi Arabia of green energy.
Osborne's recent Budget handed over £1.3billion in tax cuts to North Sea Oil operators - some of the biggest corporations on the planet. If they'd been taxed at the same level as in Norway, that would have raised an extra £118bn over the last decade for investment in clean green energy.
The SSP unashamedly demands public ownership of all forms of energy, including renewables, to democratically plan investment, job creation and production that would benefit both people and planet.
Another unique policy pioneered by the SSP is free public transport. That would overcome the poverty and social isolation suffered by hundreds of thousands of Scots who can't afford the rising fares in the privatized, profiteering transport system. It would also create skilled manufacturing jobs to build fleets of trains, buses and ferries, as well as direct jobs on an integrated transport network.

Jobs are not the only issue working class people need to judge the rival parties on. Pay is equally important.
The much vaunted new jobs are overwhelmingly low paid, as well as insecure. Two-thirds of people who found a job in 2014 are paid less than £7.65-an-hour.
The government - and its allegedly impartial adviser, the Low Pay Commission - have the audacity to boast that a full 1.2 million workers will 'enjoy' the 20p rise on the over-21s national minimum wage next October, rising to the giddy heights of £6.70 an hour. That should be a source of shame, not boastfulness.
But what do the other parties offer?

Labour is trying to work the biggest con-trick in modern times with their pledge cards promising an £8 minimum wage. What they coyly hide from the casual reader or listener is that they won't introduce it until 2020!
So what do they expect millions to survive on for the next 5 years? And how much better than today's £6.50 will that be worth by 2020, if any? And what about the fact they make no promises of scrapping the lower youth rates?

SNP OPPOSE £10 - EVEN IN 2020!
The SNP headline their support for the so-called Living Wage, currently £7.85. For workers on or just above the miserly £6.50 minimum wage, this would be a very welcome pay rise. But apart from the fact it is still too low to be accurately described as a 'living wage', it is entirely voluntary, not legally enforceable, which of course allows the SNP to sound good to workers whilst not offending businesses who have no intention of voluntarily paying that rate.

And to underline their stance, for anyone not paying proper attention to the policy of the SNP, they blocked and amended a Motion in the Scottish parliament last week which called for a minimum wage of £10 an hour - not now, but in five years' time, 2020. Even that modest plan, put by the Greens, was far too much for the SNP, as well as - predictably - Labour MSPs.
By way of contrast with all the pro-big business parties, the SSP has persistently demanded a war on poverty pay by the introduction of a living minimum wage - currently of £10 an hour, for all over 16, abolishing the lower youth rates. We call for that £10 NOW, in 2015, not 2020 or some other distant date - based on the modest formula of a legally enforced minimum set at two-thirds median male wages in Scotland.
It's a policy we share with the Bakers' union (BFAWU) and indeed the entire TUC. It's time the trade union leaders fought for this fine policy, instead of handing members' funds - and trying to hand members' votes - to a Labour Party that has neither a track record nor any intention of seriously banishing poverty pay.

This general election comes just after the 30th anniversary of the 1984/5 miners' strike. That defeat for the NUM, at the hands of Thatcher and the entire state apparatus, was a decisive turning point in the fortunes of the working class - a defeat that could easily have been an historic victory if the leaders of other unions and the Labour Party had shown an ounce of the courage displayed by the miners, their families and communities.
It is no accident that the 30 years since have been marked by growing poverty and inequality in the midst of vastly increased wealth for the 1%. One of the chief weapons fashioned and used by the employers and their governments to drive down workers' wages is the battery of anti-trade union laws - devised by Thatcher's Tories, retained by New Labour during their 13 years in government, and added to by David Cameron, Vince Cable et al since 2010.
Where is the hue and cry about this vicious apparatus for keeping the working class in 'their place'?

The Tories are increasingly shrill in their threats of making it virtually impossible to exercise the basic human right to withdraw your labour, to strike in defense of wages, jobs or rights at work. They openly talk of legislating for a 50% threshold for the turnout before any majority vote for action is legal. This from the Tories who seized power in 2010 after only 23% of the UK electorate voted for them!
Labour's silence says it all. They have absolutely no intention of repealing the worst, most repressive employment legislation in the western world. They kept it intact for 13 years in office. They have just as much desire to help boost business profits by holding workers in check as the Tories do.
The SNP make welcome statements about embracing trade unionism and 'the benefits of collective bargaining'. But nowhere have they ever unequivocally pledged to repeal all the anti-union laws.

In contrast, the SSP shares the demands of most trade unions for outright repeal of these laws. Laws which price workers out of justice through £1,200-plus fees for Employment Tribunal hearings; make it virtually impossible to recruit openly to the unions in most workplaces; hamper the ability of union reps to function and represent members; and ban united action, including solidarity strikes and those deemed 'political'.
We want to collaborate with workers and their unions to instead demand a Charter of Workers' Rights, including the right to join, be active in and organise unions without fear of victimization; for full, open access to workers for union reps and officials; full legal rights from the first day of employment (not after two years!); the re-establishment of free collective bargaining; the right to strike after a majority vote, including the right to take solidarity action with fellow workers; and ultimately for boards of directors to have a majority of elected workers' representatives on them, for real workplace democracy.

Jobs, pay and workplace rights are central issues to judge any party by. And on their track record, not just their election-time promises! These issues put them to a central test: whose side are they on? Working people, or the profiteers?
The working class majority population will remain when the general election circus moves on after May 7th. We should put the politicians on the spot, spear their falsehoods and vague words, and resolve to build a mass, working class socialist party that stands up for decent, secure, well-paid jobs and workplace democracy.
Scotland's socialist party, the SSP, is here to stay beyond May 7th, to play our part in that struggle.

Tuesday, 10 March 2015


If you believe George Osborne, David Cameron and a chunk of the media, workers are back in the land of milk and honey. We're told our wages are exceeding inflation for the first time since before the 2008 recession. Reality is a bit less rosy for those working to remain poor.

Real wages plummeted by £50 a week in 2014. For the first time since the 1920s, real wages are lower at the end of a government's term of rule than when they seized office.

And a special report by Ernst Young ITEM Club last month punctured the Tories' celebratory balloons. Their chief economist, Martin Beck, wrote:

"Real wages have fallen by nearly 10% since 2008, but workers will finally see more money in their pockets this year. However, this is not a normal recovery. The move towards later retirement and huge increase in the workforce has depressed real wages as workers have priced themselves into jobs. We don't expect a return to boomtime wages any time soon."


Try telling the 200,000 Scottish workers consigned to the pitiful pay and hellish uncertainty of life on Zero Hours Contracts that things are getting better!

In any case, any workers aspiring to be as well off as they were before 2008 severely lack ambition! This was already one of the most unequal states internationally, with some of the lowest pay, longest hours of work and shortest holidays in Europe.

The SSP campaign against dreadful Zero-hours contracts.


But just in case we're not all convinced to rush off to vote Tory by their claims of rising wages, the Tories hope to bribe the gullible as the general election looms. Osborne's plans have leaked out: to raise the tax threshold "towards £11,000", with bogus boasts that this will rescue the lowest paid. In fact it wouldn't even touch many of the poorest people, because they're paying no taxes right now, due to earning below the existing £10,000 tax threshold.

That includes vast armies of part-time workers, women in particular. It includes hundreds of thousands in retail jobs, the biggest single employer in the country, and also the biggest single sector of poverty pay.

Nor will this minor tax threshold adjustment compensate public sector workers for the increased pension contributions they face next month - so they can work longer and get less in their pensions, if they aren't forced to work 'til they drop.

Very few will be fooled by the Tories' claims. Workers know full well that when VAT, Council Tax and other regressive taxes are added, the poorest 10% of the population pay 43% of their lowly incomes in taxes - whereas the richest 10% only pay 35% of the incomes they grudgingly declare! And of course they systematically dodge tax on an industrial scale, as the recent HSBC scandal confirmed.


Anger at the way wages make up a shrinking slice of the national cake of wealth is turned into justified rage when you look at the incomes of the giant employers - and of those who decide the salaries of their chief executives.

A recent survey of the incomes and directorships held by what's called the Remuneration Committees of the FTSE 100 top companies makes dangerous reading for anyone with high blood pressure! These bodies decide the pay of company executives. They consist of a narrow pool of directors of other companies, a cosseted elite who might as well be from another planet. The survey found that the average income of the members of these Remuneration Committees was £441,383 last year, 16 times the average worker's wage of £27,200. And the highest paid member of this self-serving clique of capitalists was awarded over £9.2million - an incredible 339 times as much as the average worker's wage for 2014.


In stark contrast, workers eking out an existence on poverty pay have their very own 'Remuneration Committee' - the Low Pay Commission, which annually recommends what levels of national minimum wage the government should introduce. Their latest report shamelessly boasts of 'inflation-busting increases' for the minimum wage, claiming 'the highest increase since 2007' - because they've recommended a 3% rise on the over-21s rate...wait for it...to the princely sum of £6.70 an hour!

In case such 'inflated' pay might bust the allegedly booming economy, these worthies have proposed £5.30 for workers aged 18-20, £3.87 for 16-17-year-olds, and a slave rate of £2.80 for apprentices.

This Low Pay Commission has one distinct feature: none of its nine members has even the remotest idea what it's like to live on low pay! It's made up of employers, 'independents' and those allegedly from an 'employee background'. One of the two claiming the latter role is John Hannett, general secretary of Usdaw, the biggest union in the retail sector, with 45,000 members in Scotland alone.


But those of us who are Usdaw members, working in retail on £6.50-£7.20 an hour in various firms, don't seem to be our general secretary John Hannett's first consideration; he and the UK leadership of Usdaw actually submitted a proposal to the Low Pay Commission for a £7 minimum wage from next October!

As reported in the Usdaw union magazine, our general secretary isn't on £6.50 an hour, nor even the £10 an hour he voted for at the TUC conference; he's on a salary of £94,514, plus NIC and pension contributions, plus a union car - in-work benefits totaling another £42,408! No wonder he's not storming heaven to mobilize workers in retail and other low-paid jobs to demand a decent living wage.


Far from feeling that all is glorious and comfortable for millions of workers, people are not seeing the benefits of the much trumpeted recovery in the economy, are struggling to cope with the household bills - and desperately need to become part of a massive campaign for a living minimum wage. We need our own, genuine, 'low pay commission', a force made up of the low paid and their allies, organized and determined to demand decent wages.

The SSP is determined to be at the heart of such a struggle, and are proud to have common cause with the Bakers union (BFAWU) and others battling for £10 now for all workers. We appeal to the leaderships of all trades unions to take up the cudgels in pursuit of the £10 minimum wage which every one of them voted for at the 2014 annual conference of the 7-million member TUC. And we appeal to workers to join us in the fight for union rights in every workplace - as part of the struggle to banish poverty pay, Zero Hours Contracts and the disgusting inequality created by capitalist profiteering.