COVID-19: Workers Dying for Sick Pay and Safety

 

Thousands dying from lack of safety action or income support 

Several new Reports confirm what we have contended for the past year: governments and employers are killing workers as they put big business profits ahead of workers’ health amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

The TUC reports over 10,000 workers have died of the virus, arising from workplace infections, and countless more are suffering the long-term health problems of long-Covid.

Yet, the very same week, Public Health England identified 3,549 outbreaks of COVID-19 in workplaces since last July, with another 100 last week alone, despite the whole of the UK being in lockdown. Over 500 workers tested positive in the big Swansea DVLA centre recently, and unions in Scotland have just written to the Scottish government demanding urgent action to curb the spread of COVID-19 clusters in call centres.

Those figures will be a gross underestimate, as they only cover outbreaks in offices, factories, construction sites, etc. actually reported to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

Not One Single Employer Sanctioned!

What are the HSE - and the government which funds and directs their operations - doing in response?

Not one single employer has been prosecuted for presiding over the supreme hazardous workplace conditions; failure to tackle the spread of COVID-19, with its lethal consequences.

Not one single workplace has even been issued a HSE Prohibition Notice, whereby inspectors have the power to stop workplace operations, where they judge continued industrial or commercial activity is “deemed to be injurious or damaging to health.”

Not one employer has even been fined for negligence, whereas individuals who breach lockdown regulations face penalties of up to £1,000.

One of the prime causes of employers escaping any significant sanctions from the HSE is that the latter decided to classify COVID-19 as only a “significant” threat, rather than place it in its highest risk category, of being “serious”.

In making this breath-taking decision, the HSE has been fully backed by governments.

Tory Minister Thinks COVID Deaths 'Non-Permanent'?!

In an astonishing declaration - even by the standards of the Tory government - Employment Minister Mims Davies tried to justify this inaction by the HSE when she told Parliament:     “the effects of Covid are non-permanent or reversible, non-progressive, and any disability is temporary for the working population as a whole.”

Those of us who have suffered the loss of friends or family members can angrily testify to this heartless Tory hack that death from COVID-19 is both permanent and irreversible.

HSE Pressured to Keep Workplaces Open

One experienced HSE inspector, who withheld his name for fear of retribution, told the press: “HSE internal instructions have said they would be very reluctant to support an inspector who did serve a prohibition notice.”

He went on to confirm government pressure is being brought to bear on them to keep workplaces open, failing to take account of risks to workers and their families.

“HSE are telling us ‘walk off site if you feel unsafe’, but you can’t do anything to stop work. We can leave crowded workplaces lacking social distancing if we feel ourselves threatened, but we can’t stop people from working.”

That simply confirms what we wrote last April about a complete lack of safety inspections on many construction sites, exacerbated by the advice to HSE inspectors to stay clear of risks to themselves, while meantime building workers put themselves on the line - including for non-essential work, such as building luxury apartments.

The underlying reason for this hooligan inaction by HSE bosses, in tandem with the government - taking no meaningful actions against workplaces being super-spreaders of the Coronavirus - is cuts.

The Tories tried to make much of investing £14million in HSE last June, but that’s a drop in the bucket compared with previous cuts of £100million.

No wonder HSE can’t cope with the deluge of over 100,000 Covid-related complaints from workers and the public in the past year – 25,000 of them last month alone.

It Takes Collective Workers' Action

It took strike action, and the threat of walking off the job, to force governments – in the UK, Scotland and internationally – to extend the closures of many non-essential building sites and non-food retail, or for employers to provide even the bare necessities of hand cleansers, social distancing and other safety measures in workplaces across all sectors that remained open.

And amongst the unsung frontline heroes of this year of the plague are the thousands of shop stewards and union Health and Safety representatives who have confronted employers with demands for concrete safety measures, risk assessments and cessation of unsafe work. Often facing obstruction, hostility, even victimisation, as they seek to defend workers’ lives.

For Workers' Control

This volunteer army of workers’ representatives should be at the heart of improving workplace safety - with the full collaboration of an expanded HSE inspectorate. Not just during the pandemic, but for the ongoing future.

Workers’ control of health and safety - based on the day-to-day knowledge of these people rooted in the shop floor - is not only democratic, but a far safer mechanism than reliance on remote, well-paid senior managers, wielding pressure on behalf of the owners to maximize profit, even where that means cutting corners and risking lives.

Lost Wages Prevent Self-Isolation

Meantime, medical professionals have published new Reports underlining the fatal risks workers are being subjected to, especially amongst the lowest paid, due to the utter failure of governments to provide proper support to those who should be self-isolating.

Dr Muge Cevik is an expert in infectious diseases and medical virology at the University of St Andrews.

She and a group of other experts have just published a damning report in the British Medical Journal which demonstrates that less than 20% of people are able to adhere to isolation regulations - even though the overwhelming majority are willing and wanting to do so.

The report carries data showing the vast majority of people are willing to self-isolate when tested positive, but the actual ability to do so is 3 times lower amongst those on less than £20,000 a year, or with less than £100 in savings.

The article’s other underlying conclusion is hardly a new revelation to those of us who have fought throughout the past year for full, 100% average wages for every sick or self-isolating worker, to prevent them being dragged into work by the threat of financial ruin. Lost wages are the primary reason for not following full isolation guidelines.

Low Pay and Crowded Housing

In other statements, Dr Cevik has highlighted the majority of hospitalizations are from infections amongst key workers. 

She told CNN: “There are huge outbreaks in warehouses, meatpacking plants, care homes... and the only thing that combines these sectors are low-paid workers likely to live in crowded houses.”

Back in April 2020, I wrote that the government should provide not just full average wages but the option of safe, staffed and caring self-isolation facilities (quarantine) as part of the NHS, for example by usage of unoccupied hotel rooms.

In the recent BMJ article the medical professionals argue that governments “need to focus support on those in high exposure occupations, living in overcrowded housing... and should include free and safe accommodation, alongside adequate income support, job protection and help with caring responsibilities.”

They cite examples of Test-and-Care schemes in San Francisco and New York where people testing positive are offered either free hotel accommodation or free delivery of food, medicine and transport (and even dog walking services) to help them quarantine at home.

Predictably, those measures have not only boosted adherence to self-isolation but greatly increased the uptake of testing itself, as workers on a pitiful income are more likely to avoid getting tests, even though they have symptoms, because they are terrified at the prospect of being forced to take time off work on barely any income.

Terrified to Take Time Off Sick

Examples of the latter are rampant. That was one of the factors in the cruel carnage in Scotland's privatised care homes last year, where workers on or just above the miserly minimum wage, with no worthwhile occupational sick benefit schemes, dragged themselves into work to avoid going under financially.

A union organiser for taxi drivers explained: “I know a driver who had to self-isolate four times in 2 months. How does that work? These are people currently only earning £35 to £50-a-day and are in most cases being charged to install protective screens in the cab. When you’re in a desperate situation you take risks.”

Or as a cleaner described, she has been forced to come in to work in an empty office, where the staff are all working from home, to clean it 4 days a week. Last month she caught COVID-19, probably on a bus.

She stayed at home a few days but then went back to work:

“I couldn’t afford to stay at home because I was getting hardly any income. I feel guilty that I went to work and might have infected more people but I had no other option.”

When is £500 Worth Nothing? - When It's Refused!

The Tory Minister in charge of Test and Trace, Dido Harding, told Parliament that 20,000 people a day are failing to stay at home after being instructed to. Of course, countless others have avoided taking tests, out of fear of losing their income.

In a grotesque and cynical PR stunt, the government conceded payment of £500 to those forced to self-isolate... but with enough strings attached to strangle it as any kind of support for low-paid workers that could help them stay off work and help break the chains of infection. In real life, nearly half of all those who’ve applied have been refused this modest sum, including 86% of all applicants in Liverpool.

Stop a Premature Stampede Back

The governments of Westminster and Holyrood are in danger of using the rays of hope felt by us all at the rollout of Vaccines to stampede people back to non-essential work, risking yet another eruption of disease and death, as was caused by the profit-driven lunacies of ‘Eat Out and Help Out’ last summer, and the commercialised craze over the Christmas period.

Shop-floor workers’ representatives, including Health and Safety reps, should be given the full backing of their national union leaderships to resist premature reopening, and to insist on enforcement of proper health and safety measures in those workplaces unavoidably functioning.

Full Average Wages - Workers' Health Before Bosses' Wealth

In tandem with that, socialists and trade unionists need to step up to demand that employers and governments pay full,100% average wages to every worker, whether on furlough, sick leave or in self-isolation.

Elimination of COVID-19 will require more than just vaccinations. It also needs localised Test, Trace Isolate and Care systems, free of charge.

And looking beyond immediate palliative measures, working-class people need a leadership prepared to tackle overcrowded housing, low pay, the sick joke of £95 Statutory Sick Pay – and the deeper root causes of increasingly frequent pandemics, themselves the products of a globalised capitalist system which trashes the planet and its people for profit.